Wednesday, August 26, 2020

Important Presidential Elections Analysis Essay Example For Students

Significant Presidential Elections Analysis Essay 1812The appointment of 1812 comprised of a fight between James Madison, and DeWitt Clinton. Madison had spoken to both Democratic and Republicanbeliefs, while Clinton was a Federalist. James Madison was conceived in Port Conway, Va., on March 16, 1751. APrinceton graduate, he joined the battle for freedom on his returnto Virginia in 1771. He had been a functioning legislator during the 1770s and1780s. He was incredibly know for supporting the Jefferson change program,and in the Continental Congress. Madison, in cooperation, hadparticipated incredibly in the, Federalist, a paper whos principle design was toratify the constitution. Madison initially became president in 1809, when hebested Charles C. Pickney. He had driven the U.S. in an extremely disagreeable war, inwhich the U.S. hadnt been readied forthe War of 1812. De Witt Clinton was a Federalist, whos principle motivation behind the political decision wasto get the U.S. out of a war where he felt was superfluous. DeWittheld each significant elective office in New York between 1797 and1828assemblyman, representative, chairman of New York City, lieutenant governor,and senator. He was an altruist and benefactor of expressions of the human experience and scienceand, as waterway official, advocated development of the Erie andChamplain channels The technique where these competitors got designation was by theElectoral College, or by King Caucus. The possibility of political conventionshad not been available as of now. There were no outsider up-and-comers inthis political race. The significant issue of this political decision was the War of 1812. The War of 1812, orMr. Madisons War, had been extremely disagreeable among various areas ofAmerica. For the most part the boat proprietors in New England. The war was assumed toprotect. This war should support their transportation, however rather, it hadkept them from exchanging and bringing in cash. The victor of the appointment of 1812 was James Madison. Madison collected128 appointive votes, while Clinton got 89, and the quantity of No VotesCast was 1. The Vice-presidential up-and-comer, who won the political race wasElbridge Gerry, who got 131 appointive votes, while Jared Ingersollreceived 86. There was no record of the quantity of mainstream votes in favor of thiselection. My assessment of why Madison had won the political race is on the grounds that he had driven thecountry into the War of 1812, and in this way, he ought to be permitted to fightit. He was additionally substantially more well known than De Witt Clinton. Madisons part inratifying the Constitution, and his other early deeds, were alsoinfluential on the voters minds. He additionally did truly well during his firstterm. 1844The contender for the appointment of 1844 were James K. Polk, and HenryClay. Two truly decent men, who had incredible designs for the U.S. Polkrepresented the Democratic party, while Clay spoke to the Whigs. James Knox Polk was conceived in Mecklenburg County, N.C., on November 2, 1795. He moved on from the University of North Carolina, from which he thenmoved to Tennessee, where he got conspicuous in state legislative issues. He waselected to the place of delegates in 1825. He was chosen Speaker ofthe House in 1835. After four years, he was chosen legislative leader of Tennessee,but was beaten in goes after for re-appointment in 1841, and 1843. Martin VanBuren, the president preceding the 1844 political decision, relied on Polk as hisrunning mate; however when Van Burens remain on Texas estranged Southernsupport, the show swung to Polk on the Ninth polling form. Henry Clay, a key figure in U.S. governmental issues during the primary portion of the19th century, was an ace of the specialty of political trade off. Conceived inHanover County, Va., on April 12, 1777, he considered law in Richmond andmoved to the boondocks territory of Kentucky in 1797. Earth turned out to be more and moreimportant in Kentucky legislative issues, turning out to be speaker of the state get together in1807, and winning political race to the U.S. Place of Representatives in 1811. Earth made his first pursue the administration in 1824. Four men ran,including Andrew Jackson, were on the polling form. At the point when no up-and-comer won amajority, Clay tossed his help to John Quincy Adams. Adams won andpromptly named Clay his secretary of state. The gathering individuals won their application by essential. The significant bombshell of thistime occurred during the Democratic show. Everybody expected VanBuren to be named the Democratic competitor, but since of Van Buren sstand on Texas, the assignment went to Polk. This political decision hosted nothird-get-together up-and-comers. The significant issue of this political decision was the issue of Texas. Polk and theDemocrats, needed Texas in the Union. Mud additionally needed Texas, however he wasafraid that the obtaining of Texas would prompt war with Mexico. Claynever made it understood exactly where the Whig party stood. The Oregon territoryhad likewise been a major piece of this political decision. Oregon was the name given toall the land among Alaska and California, west of the Rocky Mountains. Both Great Britain and the U.S. guaranteed it. Polk said that the Oregonterritory would be Americas, regardless of whether it prompted war. The victor of the political decision was James K. Polk. He pulled in 170 electoralvotes, while Henry Clay got 105. There is no record of the number ofpopular votes in favor of this political race. My assessment of why Polk won this political race is a result of his remain ashore. He accepted extraordinarily in Manifest Destiny, and this was famous at thetime. Dirt, and the Whig party never made it understood with regards to where they stoodon Texas. Maybe if the voters had known without a doubt on which side of theline they stood, this political decision may have had an alternate result. 1912The appointment of 1912 was a three-man race between Theodore Roosevelt, whowas a Progressive, William H. Taft, a Republican, and Woodrow Wilson, aDemocrat. Every one had their own thoughts on the most proficient method to change America, however onlyone would get an opportunity to do as such. Conceived in NYC on October in 1858, Theodore Roosevelt was a Harvard graduate. His inclinations included farming, legislative issues, and composing. Roosevelt was aRepublican individual from the New York get together from 1882-1884. He was anunsuccessful possibility for city hall leader of NYC in 1886, however became policecommissioner of NYC in 1895. Roosevelt expected the activity of president in1901, after the death of McKinley. Theodore Roosevelt embarkedmainly on moderating regular assets. He was very anit-large buisness. After his term was up, he was crushed in presidential essential as aRepublican, so he decided to begin his own gathering, known as theProgressives. Teddy pulled the vast majority of the votes in appointment of 1912, butthe split among him and Taft made Wilson become president. regular EssayWhy F.D.R. won the political decision as I would like to think is on the grounds that he was a greatpresident. The American individuals adored him, and his style of government. Hegained the trust of the American individuals, by getting them out of the GreatDepression. That is the reason he was chosen for the administration more than anyother president before his time. 1964The appointment of 1964 was a challenge between Lyndon B. Johnson, a Democrat,and Barry M. Goldwater, a Republican. Johnson was conceived on August 27, 1908, close to Johnson City, Texas, the eldestson of Sam Early Johnson, Jr., and Rebekah Baines Johnson. Johnsonattended government funded schools in Johnson City and got a B.S. degree fromSouthwest Texas State Teachers College in San Marcos. He at that point instructed for ayear in Houston before going to Washington in 1931 as secretary to aDemocratic Texas congressman, Richard M. Kleberg. In 1933, Franklin D. Roosevelt was chosen President. Johnson enormously appreciated the president,who named him, at age 27, to head the National Youth Administration inTexas. In 1937, Johnson looked for and won a Texas seat in Congress, where hemastered open works, recovery, and open force programs. When warcame to Europe he sponsored Roosevelts endeavors to help the Allies. DuringWorld War II he served a concise voyage through deployment ready with the U.S. Naval force inthe Pacific, yet came back to Capitol Hill when Roosevelt reviewed membersof Congress from deployment ready. Johnson kept on supporting Rooseveltsmilitary and international strategy programs.In 1953 he won the activity of SenateDemocratic pioneer. The following year he was effortlessly reappointed as congressperson andreturned to Washington as larger part pioneer, a post he held for the following 6years regardless of a genuine coronary failure in 1955. Barry Morris Goldwater, conceived in Phoenix, Arizona on January 1, 1909, wasthe ineffective Republican presidential applicant in 1964. Goldwater waselected to the Senate from Arizona in 1952. A firm moderate, he becamea representative for traditional Republicans in their battle against biggovernment, upholding rather more prominent state and neighborhood powers. Hevigorously contradicted government assistance allocations as communist and soughtto check open responsibility for. A solid enemy of Communist, Goldwatersupported American military intercession in Vietnam and censured effortsto accomplish tranquility with the USSR. He was definitively crushed by LyndonJohnson in the 1964 presidential political race. Goldwater served in the Senateuntil retirement in 1987. Every competitor won his assignment by a Presidential Convention, with theprocess of essential races. There were no outsider applicants in thiselection. The principle issue of this political race was social liberties. Numerous individuals opposedLyndon B. Johnsons laws, guaranteeing them to be too professional dark. Manyliberals and blacks themselves accepted that the laws didnt go far enough. Race riots broke out in various urban communities as a result of these contentions. The victor of the political race was Johnson, by a surprising margin. He got apopular vote aggregate of 43,129,484, and an appointive vote aggregate of 486. Goldwater, then again, won a famous vote aggregate of 27,178,188, andan discretionary vote aggregate of 52. The explanation Johnson won the appointment of 1964, as I would like to think is on the grounds that ofhis earlier term. He had the option to recapture control of the White House, aftertaking over for the killed John F. Kennedy. It was a period ofequality and social liberties, and numerous individuals preferred and concurred with where hestood on these issues. 1988The appointment of 1988 was a challenge between George Bush, and MichaelDuk

Saturday, August 22, 2020

What Is Premarital Sex Essay Example For Students

What Is Premarital Sex Essay During the twentieth century, pre-marriage sex has become a significant issue. Sexual restraint was the typical society way of life until the late 1950s. Most people would not have ever laid down with someone else without any father present. While this sexual forbearance way of life was as a result, an attitude of freedom struck the youth of the United States. They felt as if they should participate in sexual movement, just to resist societys perspective on what was ethically right. The explanation sexual restraint is an issue today is on the grounds that numerous individuals guarantee pre-marriage sex isn't right. Individuals base their suppositions on what the Bible has said. At the point when the Bible is utilized to legitimize any methods for conduct, it normally turns into an ethical issue. The primary issue close by is whether pre-marriage sex is delegated ethically right or wrong. The Catholic Church asserts that pre-marriage sex isn't right and corrupt. Not exclusively does t he Catholic Church accept this, so does almost every other Christian confidence. In numerous different nations, pre-marriage sex isn't as colossal of an issue all things considered here in the US. The reason for this is uncertain, however religion and culture appear to play into it to a great extent. During the 1990s, the educating of restraint is starting to be executed into the government funded educational systems. The energy for the simply state no methodology started with the G.O.P. Government assistance Reform Act, known as Title V. It appropriates fifty million dollars every year for a long time to programs that educate teenagers to remain abstinent until marriage. Since the measure produced results two years back, forty-eight states have chosen to take part. Of these forty-eight states, five states have gone above and beyond, necessitating that forbearance be the main projects instructed. California and New Hampshire are the main two expresses that have restored their govern ment awards, since they would pass on this program. A few schools in Minnesota have a double track sex training program. It is dependent upon the guardians to choose what they might want their kids to examine. There is a great deal of discussion about these projects on the grounds that the issue of sexual forbearance is so dubious. Debra Hauser, Vice President of Advocates for Youth in Washington says, in the last couple years weve seen a tremendous increment in the quantity of government funded schools that are limiting the sum and sort of data educators can give in the study hall. (Gardner, Christian Science Monitor, p. B1) School nurture Esther Splaine contends, Every year, twelve million American adolescents are explicitly dynamic. About one million adolescents become pregnant, and 3,000,000 agreement an explicitly transmitted infection. On through restraint will youngsters dodge these and different issues identified with too soon sex. (Nursery worker, Christian Science Monitor, p. B1) The biggest obstruction of this issue is that there is no agreement on the idea of the emergency. What's more, there isn't a powerful answer for facilitating the predicament. While there are numerous projects, other than schools, that help this thought of forbearance just educating, there are similarly the same number of that are restricted. Most general wellbeing specialists have worry that these restraint no one but projects could fix years worth of progress in training concerning safe sex. Of the five expresses that hold the forbearance just strategy, contemplates have demonstrated that there was not a postponement in the beginning of sex. In another eleven investigations, results show that programs that joined forbearance and preventative projects either postponed adolescent sexual movement, or diminished its recurrence. In another study directed by Eric Tooley, of the 200 members in their second year of forbearance just classes, 60% have just lost their virginity, and ten of the young ladies are pregnant. (Morse; Hylton, Time, p. 79) This demonstrates the projects should be refined so as to be compelling. With new projects, for example, these, it is incredibly hard to instate them such that it benefits everybody. The Catholic Church feels just as it is ideal to spare sex until marriage. Numerous catholic chiefs anticipated the threat of easygoing sex, particularly with undergrads. Pope John Paul II regularly stands up on the injuries that outcome from pre-marriage sex. As expressed in Crisis magazine the Pope claims, one of the results of expelling human sexuality from the setting of wedded love is a depersonalization of the human body. The body turns out to be just an article for use, while the more extensive and more profound necessities of human poise and joy are disregarded. (Desmond, Crisis, p. 12) As the Pope keeps on lecturing these useful tidbits a lion's share of the admonitions go unnoticed, in colleges and secondary schools the same. The Catholic Church sees examine done, and utilizes it to clarify what has turned out badly. Numerous specialists state that youngster sex is at a high because of what the media and busi ness world put out. In numerous youngster magazines, there are answers to practically any teenagers sexual inquiry. They utilize these magazines to help make sense of the specialized necessities of sexual intrigue and execution. The congregation additionally accepts that family breakdown, the pill, and a neo-Enlightenment confidence in the characteristic decency of youngsters debilitated parental purpose to transmit virtues. These are not by any means the only reasons the congregation doesn't approve sex before marriage. Numerous ministers and priests seek the Bible for the appropriate responses with regards to why one ought to swear off pre-marriage sex. The Bible says in Acts 15:29 to the Gentiles, You are to go without the meat of choked creatures and from extramarital perversion. You will progress nicely on the off chance that you maintain a strategic distance from these things. In Hebrews 13:4 it states, Marriage ought to be regarded by all, and the marriage bed kept unadultera ted, for God will pass judgment on the philanderer and all the explicitly immoral.Not just does the holy book discuss remaining unadulterated in the New Testament, it is likewise talked about in the Old Testament, or the Hebrew Bible. In Genesis 2:24 it is expressed, For this explanation a man will leave his dad and mom and be joined to his significant other and they will become one substance. The possibility of one tissue is the bond between a man and his significant other and the profound and sexual bond that is shaped. From these one can evaluate that one ought to stay unadulterated. The genuine feeling of the word unadulterated as characterized by Zondervan Study Bible may be, to be liberated from all corrupt of that which is lecherous. Contemporary lessons state that it is good for submitted people to take an interest in sexual closeness, regardless of whether they are not hitched. This thought is in opposition to Gods lessons in the Bible. The Bible cases many occasions over t hat God restricts sexual relations with any individual who is certifiably not a legitimate life partner. The Protestant Church centers around these issues as the reasons not to take part in sexual action before marriage. There are numerous different countries that utilization different sources to characterize their terms of sexual ethical quality, or need there of. In an investigation done by the Journal of Sex Research a sum of 33,590 reactions were utilized to ascertain the mentality toward non-conjugal and high schooler sex issues. The investigation found that pre-marriage sex is the most acknowledged of the four sorts of non-conjugal sex. About sixty-one percent of the twenty-four nations reviewed guarantee that pre-marriage sex is right. Forty-four percent of the Japanese case that pre-marriage sex isn't right just some of the time, contrasted with the mean of fifteen percent over all the nations. In a large portion of the nations considered, the acknowledgment of pre-marriage sex is more acknowledged with grown-ups instead of adolescents. Fifty-eight percent censure youthful adolescents engaging in sexual relations as never right. Bulgaria, New Zealand, Ireland, Northern Ireland, Philippines, Poland, and the US present the least resistance for pre-marriage high schooler sex. Of these Nations, Ireland, Northern Ireland, Poland and the US, show a solid objection for a wide range of non-conjugal sex. These nations are on the whole predominately Christian. Sweden is the nation that is by all accounts the most tolerating to pre-marriage sex. As one ganders at the aftereffect of the survey, it is conceivable to see the acknowledgment of this issue. Commonly pre-marriage sex is additionally utilized as an approach to claim ones love for another. Love on an amazingly private level. Typically when an individual gets explicitly included, sex starts to be the principle focal point of the relationship. When there isn't the obligation of lifetime responsibility that marriage brings, it is anything but difficult to leave the relationship and search for sexual fulfillment somewhere else. love isn't deciphered as a minor epiphenomenon of sexual drives and impulses in the feeling of an alleged sublimation. Love is as essential a marvel as sex. Ordinarily , sex is a method of articulation for adoration. Sex is supported, even blessed, when, yet just as long as, it is a vehicle of adoration. Subsequently love isn't comprehended as a simple reaction of sex; rather sex is a method of communicating the experience of that extreme fellowship which is called love (Frankl, 1959, p. 134)This statement originates from Victor Frankls book Mans Search for Meaning. It clarifies the explanation individuals should hold up until marriage, without referencing pre-marriage sex. The possibility of extreme fellowship ought to be one that is bound with extreme love. In the event that one loves another to such an incredible degree, at that point there would be no strain to take part in sexual action. Love so frequently is by all accounts the motivation to partake in sexual acts yet, love ought to do the higher useful for another. Participating in sex before marriage is in reality not doing the higher useful for another. There is a lot of a passionate and physical connection for it to be the higher acceptable. Love is additionally 100 percent giving; it ought to never be the necessary chore. At the point when the Greeks characterized love, they arranged it into three levels: Eros, Filia, and Agape. Eros is sexual love and furthermore the least degree of affection. Indeed, even to the Greeks Eros was not implied as adoration with numerous accomplices. It was implied as a restrictive love. As it ought to be, love should consistently be a restrictive responsibility. At the point when sexuality is shared, there are likewise results. The principle results are that the individual will be set hig

Friday, August 21, 2020

History and Medication Timeline of ADHD

History and Medication Timeline of ADHD ADHD Print History and Medication Timeline of ADHD By Vincent Iannelli, MD facebook Vincent Iannelli, MD, is a board-certified pediatrician and fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Dr. Iannelli has cared for children for more than 20 years. Learn about our editorial policy Vincent Iannelli, MD Medically reviewed by a board-certified physician Updated on February 20, 2020 ADHD Overview Symptoms Causes Diagnosis Treatment Living With In Children Niedring/Drentwett / Getty Images While ADHD wasnt always recognized, diagnosed, or treated as much as it is now, doctors have actually known about ADHD for some time. Previous Names for ADHD They didnt always call it ADHD, though, and used terms like: Brain-injuredBrain-damaged childHyperkinetic impulse disorderHyperexcitability syndromeClumsy child syndromeHyperactive child syndromeHyperkinetic reaction of childhoodMinimal brain dysfunctionOrganic brain diseaseNervous childAttention deficit disorder Even now, there is confusion about whether to call it ADD or ADHD. History of ADHD The earliest references to an ADHD-like disorder date back to the late-18th century and Sir Alexander Crichton.?? Some even try to say that many famous people and historical figures could have had ADHD, such as Mozart, Leonardo da Vinci, or Ben Franklin. Work on ADHD is more often thought to begin in the early 20th century, though: The first descriptions of children with ADHD symptoms are made as early as 1902 by Sir George Frederick Still and were thought to have a defect of moral control??In 1908, Alfred F. Tredgold describes high-grade feeble-minded children who likely had a form of mild brain damage that caused them to have ADHD-like anti-school behaviorA study is published describing the use of Benzedrine (racemic amphetamine) in children with behavior problems in 1937 by Dr. Charles Bradley, who accidentally learned about the benefits of benzedrine when giving the medication to help kids who had severe headaches, but noticed it instead helped their behavior and school performance??The first edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in 1952 and includes no mention of an ADHD-like disorderHerbert Freed and Charles Peifer study the use of Thorazine (chlorpromazine) on hyperkinetic emotionally disturbed children in 195 6??Hyperkinetic impulse disorder is first used to describe children with ADHD symptoms in 1957C. Keith Conners publishes a study on the effects of Ritalin (methylphenidate) in emotionally disturbed children in 1963??In 1966, minimal brain dysfunction syndrome becomes a popular term to describe kids with various combinations of impairment in perception, conceptualization, language, memory, and control of attention, impulse, or motor functionIn 1967 and 1968, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) gives a number of grants to researchers to study the effectiveness of stimulants for children with ADHD symptomsThe second edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-II) is published by the APA in 1968 and includes the disorders hyperkinetic reaction of childhood or adolescence and organic brain syndromeThe first Conners Rating Scale is published by C. Keith Conners in 1969, which eventually leads to revised editions of the Conners Rating Scales for par ents and teachersIn 1970, the Washington Post published a story describing how 5 to 10 percent of all school children in Omaha, Nebraska were receiving stimulants, like Ritalin, to control their behavior, even though the statistics only referred to kids in special-ed programs. The story creates controversy around the diagnosis of ADHD and the use of stimulants, especially since it implies that many parents are coerced into medicating their kidsThe Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 make stimulants, such as Ritalin (methylphenidate), Schedule III medications and then Schedule II medications in 1971??Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 can allow students with ADHD who qualify to get additional help and services at school to help them succeedAn anti-Ritalin movement greatly expands in 1975 as several books are published to help reinforce the belief that ADHD isnt a real diagnosis, was created by drug companies to make money, or that hyperactivity is c aused by food allergies and food additives, etc.The AAP publishes their first statement about ADHD, Medication for Hyperkinetic Children, which says that in addition to consideration of nondrug therapy in situations where such an approach is appropriate, that there is a place for stimulant drugs in the treatment of hyperkinetic childrenThe third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) is published by the APA in 1980 and includes Attention Deficit Disorder for the first time, including the subtypes ADD with hyperactivity, ADD without hyperactivity, and ADD residual typeDr. Russell A. Barkley writes his first of 17 books about ADHD in 1981 - Hyperactive children: A handbook for diagnosis and treatmentThe DSM-III-R (revised edition), published in 1987, again changes the name, this time to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), but doesnt include any subtypesA 1987 report from the AAP, Medication for Children With an Attention Deficit Dis order, offers indications for drug therapy in the treatment of attention deficit disorder, such as Ritalin, Dexedrine, Cylert, and other potentially useful drugs, including tricyclic antidepressantsDr. Barkley begins publishing The ADHD Report newsletter in 1993The fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) is published by the APA in 2000 and describes three types of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), including ADHD, Combined Type, ADHD, Predominantly Inattentive Type, and ADHD, Predominantly Hyperactive-Impulsive TypeJoseph Biederman publishes one of the first of hundreds of medical studies about children with ADHD in 1995An updated AAP report, Medication for Children With Attention Disorders, published in 1996, stresses that drug therapy should be combined with appropriate management of the childs environment and curriculumThe 2000 Clinical Practice Guideline: Diagnosis and Evaluation of the Child With Attention-Deficit/Hy peractivity Disorder from the AAP offer clear guidance for pediatricians and parents on the assessment and treatment of kids with ADHDStrattera, the first non-stimulant treatment for ADHD, is approved in 2002Warning labels on ADHD medications are updated in 2007 to include warnings about the possibility of cardiovascular risks (sudden death in children and adolescents with structural cardiac abnormalities or other serious heart problems) and risks of adverse psychiatric symptoms (hallucinations, delusional thinking, or mania) ADHD Medication Timeline Dr. Bradleys studies on the use of Benzedrine was once thought of as heralding the modern era of ADHD treatment, but that role has likely now passed to the newer, once-a-day ADHD medications that most kids take. Although it seems like a lot of different  ADHD medications  have been developed over the years, especially in the last ten years, most of them use same basic active ingredients (methylphenidate and amphetamine/dextroamphetamine) that have been used since the earliest days of ADHD research. 1937 - Benzedrine (racemic amphetamine)1943 - Desoxyn (methamphetamine hydrochloride)1955 - Ritalin (methylphenidate)1955-1983 - Biphetamine (mixed amphetamine/dextroamphetamine resin)1960 - Adderall (mixed amphetamine/dextroamphetamine salts)1975-2003 - Cylert (pemoline)1976 - Dextrostat (dextroamphetamine)1976 - Dexedrine (dextroamphetamine)1982 - Ritalin SR1999 - Metadate ER (methylphenidate)2000 -  Concerta  (methylphenidate)2000 - Methylin ER (methylphenidate)2001 - Metadate CD (methylphenidate)2001 - Focalin (dexmethylphenidate)2001 -  Adderall XR  (mixed amphetamine salts)2002 - Ritalin LA2002 - Methylin (methylphenidate) oral solution and chewable tablet2002 - Strattera (atomoxetine)2005 -  Focalin XR  (dexmethylphenidate)2006 -  Daytrana  (methylphenidate patch)2007 -  Vyvanse  (lisdexamfetamine  dimesylate)2008 - Procentra (liquid dextroamphetamine)2009 -  Intuniv  (guanfacine hydrochloride)2010 - Kapvay (clonidine  hydrochloride)2012 - Quillivant XR (liquid methylphenidate )2016 -  Adzenys  XR-ODT (amphetamine oral disintegrating tablet)2016 - Quillichew ER (chewable methylphenidate) Many of these ADHD medications, even the extended release versions, are now available as  generics.

History and Medication Timeline of ADHD

History and Medication Timeline of ADHD ADHD Print History and Medication Timeline of ADHD By Vincent Iannelli, MD facebook Vincent Iannelli, MD, is a board-certified pediatrician and fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Dr. Iannelli has cared for children for more than 20 years. Learn about our editorial policy Vincent Iannelli, MD Medically reviewed by a board-certified physician Updated on February 20, 2020 ADHD Overview Symptoms Causes Diagnosis Treatment Living With In Children Niedring/Drentwett / Getty Images While ADHD wasnt always recognized, diagnosed, or treated as much as it is now, doctors have actually known about ADHD for some time. Previous Names for ADHD They didnt always call it ADHD, though, and used terms like: Brain-injuredBrain-damaged childHyperkinetic impulse disorderHyperexcitability syndromeClumsy child syndromeHyperactive child syndromeHyperkinetic reaction of childhoodMinimal brain dysfunctionOrganic brain diseaseNervous childAttention deficit disorder Even now, there is confusion about whether to call it ADD or ADHD. History of ADHD The earliest references to an ADHD-like disorder date back to the late-18th century and Sir Alexander Crichton.?? Some even try to say that many famous people and historical figures could have had ADHD, such as Mozart, Leonardo da Vinci, or Ben Franklin. Work on ADHD is more often thought to begin in the early 20th century, though: The first descriptions of children with ADHD symptoms are made as early as 1902 by Sir George Frederick Still and were thought to have a defect of moral control??In 1908, Alfred F. Tredgold describes high-grade feeble-minded children who likely had a form of mild brain damage that caused them to have ADHD-like anti-school behaviorA study is published describing the use of Benzedrine (racemic amphetamine) in children with behavior problems in 1937 by Dr. Charles Bradley, who accidentally learned about the benefits of benzedrine when giving the medication to help kids who had severe headaches, but noticed it instead helped their behavior and school performance??The first edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in 1952 and includes no mention of an ADHD-like disorderHerbert Freed and Charles Peifer study the use of Thorazine (chlorpromazine) on hyperkinetic emotionally disturbed children in 195 6??Hyperkinetic impulse disorder is first used to describe children with ADHD symptoms in 1957C. Keith Conners publishes a study on the effects of Ritalin (methylphenidate) in emotionally disturbed children in 1963??In 1966, minimal brain dysfunction syndrome becomes a popular term to describe kids with various combinations of impairment in perception, conceptualization, language, memory, and control of attention, impulse, or motor functionIn 1967 and 1968, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) gives a number of grants to researchers to study the effectiveness of stimulants for children with ADHD symptomsThe second edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-II) is published by the APA in 1968 and includes the disorders hyperkinetic reaction of childhood or adolescence and organic brain syndromeThe first Conners Rating Scale is published by C. Keith Conners in 1969, which eventually leads to revised editions of the Conners Rating Scales for par ents and teachersIn 1970, the Washington Post published a story describing how 5 to 10 percent of all school children in Omaha, Nebraska were receiving stimulants, like Ritalin, to control their behavior, even though the statistics only referred to kids in special-ed programs. The story creates controversy around the diagnosis of ADHD and the use of stimulants, especially since it implies that many parents are coerced into medicating their kidsThe Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 make stimulants, such as Ritalin (methylphenidate), Schedule III medications and then Schedule II medications in 1971??Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 can allow students with ADHD who qualify to get additional help and services at school to help them succeedAn anti-Ritalin movement greatly expands in 1975 as several books are published to help reinforce the belief that ADHD isnt a real diagnosis, was created by drug companies to make money, or that hyperactivity is c aused by food allergies and food additives, etc.The AAP publishes their first statement about ADHD, Medication for Hyperkinetic Children, which says that in addition to consideration of nondrug therapy in situations where such an approach is appropriate, that there is a place for stimulant drugs in the treatment of hyperkinetic childrenThe third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) is published by the APA in 1980 and includes Attention Deficit Disorder for the first time, including the subtypes ADD with hyperactivity, ADD without hyperactivity, and ADD residual typeDr. Russell A. Barkley writes his first of 17 books about ADHD in 1981 - Hyperactive children: A handbook for diagnosis and treatmentThe DSM-III-R (revised edition), published in 1987, again changes the name, this time to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), but doesnt include any subtypesA 1987 report from the AAP, Medication for Children With an Attention Deficit Dis order, offers indications for drug therapy in the treatment of attention deficit disorder, such as Ritalin, Dexedrine, Cylert, and other potentially useful drugs, including tricyclic antidepressantsDr. Barkley begins publishing The ADHD Report newsletter in 1993The fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) is published by the APA in 2000 and describes three types of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), including ADHD, Combined Type, ADHD, Predominantly Inattentive Type, and ADHD, Predominantly Hyperactive-Impulsive TypeJoseph Biederman publishes one of the first of hundreds of medical studies about children with ADHD in 1995An updated AAP report, Medication for Children With Attention Disorders, published in 1996, stresses that drug therapy should be combined with appropriate management of the childs environment and curriculumThe 2000 Clinical Practice Guideline: Diagnosis and Evaluation of the Child With Attention-Deficit/Hy peractivity Disorder from the AAP offer clear guidance for pediatricians and parents on the assessment and treatment of kids with ADHDStrattera, the first non-stimulant treatment for ADHD, is approved in 2002Warning labels on ADHD medications are updated in 2007 to include warnings about the possibility of cardiovascular risks (sudden death in children and adolescents with structural cardiac abnormalities or other serious heart problems) and risks of adverse psychiatric symptoms (hallucinations, delusional thinking, or mania) ADHD Medication Timeline Dr. Bradleys studies on the use of Benzedrine was once thought of as heralding the modern era of ADHD treatment, but that role has likely now passed to the newer, once-a-day ADHD medications that most kids take. Although it seems like a lot of different  ADHD medications  have been developed over the years, especially in the last ten years, most of them use same basic active ingredients (methylphenidate and amphetamine/dextroamphetamine) that have been used since the earliest days of ADHD research. 1937 - Benzedrine (racemic amphetamine)1943 - Desoxyn (methamphetamine hydrochloride)1955 - Ritalin (methylphenidate)1955-1983 - Biphetamine (mixed amphetamine/dextroamphetamine resin)1960 - Adderall (mixed amphetamine/dextroamphetamine salts)1975-2003 - Cylert (pemoline)1976 - Dextrostat (dextroamphetamine)1976 - Dexedrine (dextroamphetamine)1982 - Ritalin SR1999 - Metadate ER (methylphenidate)2000 -  Concerta  (methylphenidate)2000 - Methylin ER (methylphenidate)2001 - Metadate CD (methylphenidate)2001 - Focalin (dexmethylphenidate)2001 -  Adderall XR  (mixed amphetamine salts)2002 - Ritalin LA2002 - Methylin (methylphenidate) oral solution and chewable tablet2002 - Strattera (atomoxetine)2005 -  Focalin XR  (dexmethylphenidate)2006 -  Daytrana  (methylphenidate patch)2007 -  Vyvanse  (lisdexamfetamine  dimesylate)2008 - Procentra (liquid dextroamphetamine)2009 -  Intuniv  (guanfacine hydrochloride)2010 - Kapvay (clonidine  hydrochloride)2012 - Quillivant XR (liquid methylphenidate )2016 -  Adzenys  XR-ODT (amphetamine oral disintegrating tablet)2016 - Quillichew ER (chewable methylphenidate) Many of these ADHD medications, even the extended release versions, are now available as  generics.